Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 replies - 316 through 318 (of 318 total)
  • Author
  • in reply to: Dwell times #14001

    Tanya Ewing

    Hi Bence,

    Thanks so much for your speedy reply, which is very helpful! And good news that I do not need to redo my data processing.

    I have actually recently experimented with using different dwell times for U–Pb measurements, which has given me a strong appreciation for just how important they can be for the quality of the final result, as you point out.


    in reply to: Reporting results not LOD filtered #14013

    Riana Rossouw

    Hi all

    I would like to have my trace element data reported without having the results filtered with “Below LOD”. There is not an option in the Trace elements_IS DRS to not calculate LOD, and I have also put the mask value to 0. I am using Iolite 3.65.


    in reply to: No data reduction scheme is currently loaded #14016

    Lola Coussau


    Following, the error message that appears when i try to crunch the datas of a file where the signals have already been integrated, the file is just re-open on another computer.

    “it appears that no data reduction scheme is currently loaded (the function RunActiveDSR() could not be located)”

    Thank you for your help

Viewing 3 replies - 316 through 318 (of 318 total)